EQ Moves Per Instrument · Tools · Free The Music

You now have both EQ modes in your hands. Module 3.2 taught you to cut what's in the way — high-pass filters, mud-zone clearing, surgical notches. Module 3.3 taught you to add what's missing — weight, warmth, presence, air. This module brings them together. What does a vocal actually need? A kick? A bass? An acoustic guitar? Below: the concrete moves, instrument by instrument.

None of these recipes are rules. They're starting points — the moves working engineers reach for first when they hear a particular kind of problem on a particular kind of source. Every recording is different: the room, the mic, the player, the song key, the production style. Use these recipes as a launchpad, then adjust by ear and by what the mix actually needs.

One concept first — the most important EQ idea after the tools themselves: tracks don't sound right or wrong in isolation. They sound right or wrong in context. A vocal that's perfectly EQ'd in solo will often sound completely different against a full mix. The recipes below assume you're listening in context, with the mix playing.

⛓ Where this sits in the signal chain

The recipes below assume the standard processing order: HPF / subtractive cleanup → compression → additive shaping → bus EQ. The "cut" moves listed for each instrument typically happen pre-compression (Module 3.2 territory). The "boost" moves typically happen post-compression (Module 3.3 territory). If you're applying these to a track that hasn't been compressed yet, the boosts may amplify peaks the compressor would have controlled — set up your compressor first (Module 4.1), then come back to additive moves.

First, the words

Four ideas that turn EQ from "trying recipes" into "thinking about the mix." Get these in your bones and the per-instrument moves below become tools, not rules.

Concept 1

The mix-context principle

Tracks sound right or wrong only in the context of the full mix — never solo.

Think of it like the color of a paint chip in a hardware store vs. on your bedroom wall.

A paint chip looks one color under store lighting, in your hand, on the swatch card. The same paint, brushed on your bedroom wall, looks entirely different — because the surrounding colors, the ambient light, and the wall texture all change how your eye perceives it. Audio works the same way. A vocal soloed has no other tracks competing with it — the EQ moves you hear in solo aren't the moves the vocal needs in context. EQ in context, not in solo. Working engineers solo a track briefly to find a specific problem (a click, a buzz, a resonance), but they make the actual EQ decisions with the full mix playing. The recipes in this module are the moves engineers reach for after hearing a problem in context — not generic tweaks applied indiscriminately.

Concept 2

The frequency conflict

When two tracks live in the same frequency band, they fight — and listeners can't hear either one clearly.

Think of it like two people trying to talk to you at once.

If two people speak at exactly the same volume and pitch, you can't follow either of them. Their voices mask each other — every word from one obscures words from the other. Tracks in a mix do the same thing. The kick and bass both occupy 60–120 Hz. The vocal and the lead guitar both occupy 1–4 kHz. The cymbals and the vocal sibilance both occupy 6–8 kHz. When they overlap, listeners hear neither one clearly. The cure isn't to turn one down or boost the other — it's to separate them in frequency. Carve a notch in track A where track B lives, and suddenly track B has its own home and stands out. This is the single most important pro-mixing concept beyond the tools themselves.

Concept 3

The complementary cut

Cut frequency X on track A so frequency X on track B has space to be heard.

Think of it like making room on a shelf by removing one book to fit another.

If you want the lead vocal to "sit on top" of the mix, the most effective EQ move usually isn't on the vocal — it's on the tracks competing with it. Cut 3 kHz on the rhythm guitars by 2 dB and the vocal at 3 kHz suddenly has room to be heard. The vocal didn't change at all — but the space around it did. This is called complementary EQ: the cut on one track exists specifically to make room for what's on another. Working engineers think this way constantly: "the kick isn't punchy enough" → cut 60 Hz on the bass; "the snare isn't snapping" → cut 5 kHz on the cymbals; "the vocal is buried" → cut 2–4 kHz on the guitars. Complementary EQ is how separation gets engineered into a mix.

Concept 4

The reference track

A polished commercial recording you compare against to calibrate your ears and your decisions.

Think of it like a tuning fork for your mixing decisions.

A tuning fork doesn't make music — it gives you a precise reference to tune against. A reference track does the same for mixing. Pick a commercial recording in a similar style and load it into your DAW alongside your mix. Loudness-match them (so the reference and your mix play at the same perceived volume — Module 1.5). Toggle between the two as you EQ. Does your kick sound thin compared to the reference? More 60 Hz weight. Does your vocal feel buried? Listen to where the reference vocal sits and compare. Reference tracks calibrate your ears against "what good sounds like" in real time. Working mastering and mixing engineers use them on every session. Pick 2–3 references per song; switch between them to avoid copying any single one.

The diagram below shows the most common frequency conflicts in pop, worship, and rock mixes. Each pair of instruments overlaps in a specific band — and that's where complementary EQ unlocks separation. Find your mix's conflicts here, then apply the per-instrument recipes that follow.

Four conflicts cover most mixing decisions: kick vs. bass in the low-end, snare body vs. vocal warmth in the mud zone, vocal vs. guitar in the presence band, and hi-hat vs. sibilance in the upper highs. The recipes below give specific moves for each conflict.

Try this in your studio

Mix two conflicting tracks with complementary EQ

Pick a song where you have a vocal and an electric guitar (or any two tracks that fight). Solo nothing — keep the full mix playing. We'll separate them with complementary EQ.

Identify the conflict. Play the mix. Listen for the moment where both tracks are happening at once. Where do they crowd each other? Most likely it's the 1–4 kHz presence band.
Find the vocal's "money frequency." Sweep a +6 dB bell across the vocal from 1.5 kHz to 4 kHz. Find the frequency where the vocal sounds clearest, most "present." That's the vocal's home — say, 3.2 kHz.
Cut that frequency on the guitar. Open the EQ on the rhythm guitar. Put a 2 dB cut at 3.2 kHz with a wide Q (around 1.0). The guitar gives up 3.2 kHz so the vocal can live there alone.
Listen. The vocal should now sit more clearly above the guitar without you having boosted the vocal at all.
Repeat for other conflicts. Apply the same logic: kick vs. bass at 60–80 Hz, snare vs. vocal warmth at 250 Hz, hi-hat vs. sibilance at 7 kHz.
Compare to your reference track. Loudness-match a commercial recording in similar style. Does your mix have similar separation? Where it doesn't, more complementary cuts are needed.

The realization most engineers have somewhere along the way: the cleanest mixes aren't the ones with the most boosting. They're the ones with the most thoughtful cutting — where every track has its own home in the spectrum because every other track has politely cleared out of that home.

Per-instrument recipes

Working starting points for the most common sources. Cut moves typically happen pre-compression (Module 3.2 territory); boost moves typically happen post-compression (Module 3.3 territory). Always A/B against bypass; always listen in mix context.

Lead vocal

Move	Frequency	Type / Q	Amount	Why
HPF	80–120 Hz	12 dB/oct	cut	removes mic rumble, AC hum, breath wind
Mud cut	250–400 Hz	narrow bell, Q 3	−2 to −4 dB	find the boxy resonance, notch it
Honk cut	800 Hz–1 kHz	narrow bell, Q 4	−1 to −3 dB	removes "telephone" mid-range buildup
Body	150–250 Hz	wide bell, Q 1	+1 to +2 dB	warmth — careful in the mud zone
Presence	3–5 kHz	medium bell, Q 1	+2 to +3 dB	the vocal sits on top of the mix
Air	10–14 kHz	high shelf	+1 to +3 dB	polish, sheen, "expensive" feel
De-ess	5–8 kHz	narrow bell, Q 4	−2 to −6 dB (dynamic)	reduce sibilance — better with a dedicated de-esser

Backing vocals

Move	Frequency	Type / Q	Amount	Why
HPF	150–250 Hz	12 dB/oct	cut	backing vox don't need low-end — clears space for lead
Presence cut	3–5 kHz	medium bell, Q 1	−1 to −3 dB	complementary cut for the lead vocal's presence
Air	10–14 kHz	high shelf	+1 to +3 dB	helps backings spread wide and feel "sparkly"

Kick drum

Move	Frequency	Type / Q	Amount	Why
Subsonic HPF	20–30 Hz	12 dB/oct	cut	removes inaudible rumble; preserves all kick body
Boxy cut	300–500 Hz	narrow bell, Q 3	−2 to −5 dB	removes "cardboard box" cardboard quality
Sub weight	50–60 Hz	low shelf or wide bell	+1 to +3 dB	gives the kick fullness in the low-end
Body	80–120 Hz	wide bell, Q 1	+1 to +2 dB	thickens the body without booming
Beater click	3–5 kHz	medium bell, Q 1	+2 to +4 dB	adds the beater attack so the kick cuts through

Snare drum

Move	Frequency	Type / Q	Amount	Why
HPF	80–120 Hz	12 dB/oct	cut	removes kick bleed and rumble
Box cut	400–600 Hz	narrow bell, Q 3	−2 to −5 dB	removes "ringy" snare body resonance
Body / fullness	180–250 Hz	wide bell, Q 1	+1 to +2 dB	fattens snare without making it muddy
Snap / attack	5 kHz	medium bell, Q 1	+2 to +4 dB	cuts through the mix; the "crack"
Air / room	10–12 kHz	high shelf	+1 to +2 dB	opens up the snare in the mix

Hi-hats / cymbals / overheads

Move	Frequency	Type / Q	Amount	Why
HPF	250–500 Hz	12 dB/oct	cut	cymbals don't need low-mids; clears space
Harshness cut	5–8 kHz	narrow bell, Q 3	−1 to −3 dB	tames the metallic "ice pick" frequency
Stick attack	3–5 kHz	medium bell	+1 to +2 dB	defines the attack of each hit
Sparkle	10–14 kHz	high shelf	+1 to +3 dB	shimmer, dimension, top-end

Toms

Move	Frequency	Type / Q	Amount	Why
HPF	60–80 Hz	12 dB/oct	cut	cuts kick bleed and stand vibration
Ring cut	300–500 Hz	narrow bell, Q 4	−3 to −6 dB	removes the "ringy" overtone
Body	80–150 Hz (floor) or 150–250 Hz (rack)	wide bell, Q 1	+1 to +2 dB	thickens the tom
Attack	3–5 kHz	medium bell	+1 to +3 dB	defines the stick attack

Bass (DI or amp)

Move	Frequency	Type / Q	Amount	Why
Subsonic HPF	30–40 Hz	12 dB/oct	cut	removes rumble; preserves musical low-end
Mud cut	200–400 Hz	narrow bell, Q 2	−1 to −3 dB	clears the bass out of the vocal/guitar mud zone
Sub weight	60–80 Hz	low shelf or wide bell	+1 to +3 dB	fullness — careful with kick conflict
Pluck / definition	700 Hz–1.2 kHz	medium bell	+1 to +2 dB	gives the bass note definition on small speakers
String / attack	2.5–4 kHz	medium bell	+1 to +2 dB	pick attack, finger noise — helps the bass cut

Acoustic guitar

Move	Frequency	Type / Q	Amount	Why
HPF	100–150 Hz	12 dB/oct	cut	in band mix; clears bass space
Boom cut	200–250 Hz	medium bell, Q 2	−2 to −4 dB	removes soundhole boom
Honk cut	700 Hz–1 kHz	narrow bell, Q 4	−1 to −3 dB	removes "honky" mid resonance
Body / fullness	120–200 Hz	wide bell, Q 1	+1 to +2 dB	warmth without boom
String detail	4–6 kHz	medium bell	+1 to +2 dB	pick attack, articulation
Shimmer	10–14 kHz	high shelf	+1 to +2 dB	top-end sparkle

Electric guitar (clean)

Move	Frequency	Type / Q	Amount	Why
HPF	80–120 Hz	12 dB/oct	cut	removes amp/cab low-end
Mud cut	200–400 Hz	narrow bell, Q 3	−2 to −4 dB	find and notch boxy resonance
Vocal cut	3–4 kHz	wide bell, Q 1	−1 to −2 dB	complementary cut to make room for the lead vocal
Bite	2.5–4 kHz	medium bell	+1 to +2 dB (lead) / 0 (rhythm)	cuts through (apply to lead, not rhythm)
Sparkle	6–10 kHz	high shelf	+1 to +2 dB	edge for clean tones

Electric guitar (distorted)

Move	Frequency	Type / Q	Amount	Why
HPF	120–180 Hz	12 dB/oct	cut	distorted guitars have fizzy low-mids that cloud the bass
Fizz cut	3–4 kHz	narrow bell, Q 3	−2 to −4 dB	removes "fizz" or "pick scratch" buildup
Vocal cut	2–4 kHz	wide bell, Q 1	−1 to −3 dB	complementary cut for the lead vocal
Body	200–400 Hz	wide bell, Q 0.7	+1 dB only	only if the guitar feels thin (mud zone risk)
Bite (lead only)	2.5 kHz	medium bell	+2 dB on lead	only for solo / lead lines

Piano / acoustic keys

Move	Frequency	Type / Q	Amount	Why
HPF (in band)	100–200 Hz	12 dB/oct	cut	removes lower octaves competing with bass
Boom cut	200–400 Hz	medium bell, Q 2	−1 to −2 dB	tames lower midrange boom
Warmth	200–400 Hz	wide bell, Q 1	+1 dB max	only for solo piano (mud zone risk in band)
Presence	3–5 kHz	medium bell	+1 to +2 dB	note attack and clarity
Air / dimension	10–12 kHz	high shelf	+1 to +2 dB	top-end shimmer

Synth pads

Move	Frequency	Type / Q	Amount	Why
HPF aggressive	200–300 Hz	12 dB/oct	cut	pads spread everywhere; HPF keeps them in the upper register
Vocal cut	2–4 kHz	wide bell, Q 1	−2 to −3 dB	pads and vocals fight; cut the pad to make room
Air / spread	8–12 kHz	high shelf	+1 to +3 dB	pads sit better with extended top-end
Movement	1–2 kHz	medium bell	+1 dB	adds interest without conflicting with the vocal

Synth lead / arp / pluck

Move	Frequency	Type / Q	Amount	Why
HPF	120–200 Hz	12 dB/oct	cut	removes low-end mush from layered synth oscillators
Fizz cut	3–5 kHz	narrow bell, Q 3	−1 to −3 dB	tames sawtooth fizz buildup
Cut-through	2–4 kHz	medium bell	+1 to +2 dB	helps lead synths cut through; replace if cutting
Sparkle	8–12 kHz	high shelf	+1 to +2 dB	top-end definition

Strings / horns

Move	Frequency	Type / Q	Amount	Why
HPF	100–200 Hz	12 dB/oct	cut	orchestral elements rarely need sub-bass in a pop mix
Honk cut	500 Hz–1 kHz	narrow bell, Q 3	−1 to −3 dB	tames "nasal" string section resonance
Warmth	200–300 Hz	wide bell, Q 1	+1 dB	fullness without mud
Bow / breath	3–5 kHz	medium bell	+1 to +2 dB	adds bow attack on strings, breath on horns
Air	10–12 kHz	high shelf	+1 to +2 dB	orchestral dimension

"The best EQ moves don't make a track sound 'EQ'd.' They make a mix sound right. If your tracks all sound great in solo and your mix sounds congested, your EQ is wrong. Listen in context." — FTM, on context-driven EQ

The complementary EQ technique — vocal-up mixing

The single most-used pro mixing move is making space for the vocal by cutting other tracks. It works in three steps:

Find the vocal's "money frequency." Sweep a +6 dB bell across the vocal from 1.5 kHz to 5 kHz with the full mix playing. Find where the vocal sounds most present, most "in front." Note the frequency — say 3.2 kHz.
Cut that frequency on competing tracks. On every track that's likely fighting the vocal at that band — rhythm guitars, lead synths, busy keys — cut 1–3 dB at the vocal's money frequency, with a wide Q (1.0).
Listen back. The vocal now occupies a band other tracks have politely vacated. Result: the vocal sits clearly without you having boosted it. The mix sounds open, not crowded.

Apply the same logic for any other "lead" element — a lead guitar that's getting buried, a saxophone solo, a featured synth line. Find its money frequency; cut competing tracks at that band.

Translation — making sure your EQ choices work everywhere

A mix that sounds great on your monitors but bad in a car or on phone speakers is a mix that hasn't translated. EQ decisions are a major translation factor. The ways to make EQ translate:

Mix at moderate levels (75 dB SPL). Loud monitoring makes you under-EQ low and high; quiet monitoring makes you over-EQ them (Module 2.1, Fletcher-Munson).
Reference commercial tracks frequently. Loudness-matched A/B comparisons calibrate your tonal sense.
Check on multiple speaker systems. Phone speaker, laptop, car, headphones, monitors. Each reveals different EQ problems.
Use a mono check. Sum the mix to mono on a single speaker. Phase issues, balance issues, and EQ buildup all become more obvious.
Don't trust visual feedback alone. A spectrum analyzer can confirm what's there, but the ear decides what works.

This lesson draws on

FTM doesn't make this stuff up. The recipes here distill techniques from working engineers' published interviews, reference books, and mix-rescue case studies. Where to keep going for depth:

Mike Senior — Mixing Secrets for the Small Studio. Per-instrument EQ recipes throughout, plus the complementary-EQ approach to vocal-up mixing.
Bobby Owsinski — The Mixing Engineer's Handbook (4th ed.). Reference sections on EQ moves per instrument; many recipes here are distilled from his frameworks.
Andrew Scheps — Mix With The Masters seminars. His documented EQ chains for vocal, drum bus, and master bus inform several recipes here.
Chris Lord-Alge (CLA) — interviews on Pensado's Place and Mix With The Masters. The 4 kHz vocal carve and the snare 5 kHz boost are foundational CLA moves.
Tony Maserati — interviews with the Maserati Vocal Channel waves plugin documentation. Vocal recipes draw from his published settings.
Dave Pensado — Pensado's Place. Hundreds of free interviews with working engineers on per-instrument EQ.
Sound on Sound — "Mix Rescue" series. Real-world per-instrument EQ fixes on member-submitted mixes — extremely practical.
iZotope — published mixing guides. "Mixing Vocals," "Mixing Drums," "Mixing Bass," "Mixing Guitars" all cover recipes with audio examples.
Greg Wells, Manny Marroquin, Tchad Blake — published interviews on per-instrument approach. Diverse perspectives that all converge on similar core moves.
Apple Logic Pro Documentation, Ableton Reference Manual — manufacturer EQ documentation cited for stock-plugin contexts.

Tools · Module 3 (EQ) complete

You've finished the EQ track

Foundations, subtractive, additive, and per-instrument recipes — every EQ move you'll use in 95% of mixes. From here, the next step in the signal chain is compression (Module 4) — controlling dynamics, shaping transients, gluing elements together. Compression sits between subtractive and additive EQ in your channel chain, and pairs with EQ in every mix you'll ever do.

Next up · Module 4.2

Parallel & Sidechain Compression — the advanced compression techniques

Continue